Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Donohue

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1995No. S-6530PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a dispute between two attorneys regarding division of attorney’s fees following the successful prosecution of a medical malpractice lawsuit for the death of Elena Kat-ehatag.1 Leonard Kelley claims he entered into a fee-splitting agreement with William Donohue. Donohue denies any such agreement. The probate court held that it had jurisdiction to decide the dispute and concluded that Kelley had no legally enforceable contingent fee contract. It later found that Kelley had waived a quantum meruit claim. Kelley argues the probate court had no…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gates v. City of Tenakee SpringsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Holstein v. GrossmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Citizens Coalition for Tort Reform, Inc. v. McAlpineAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In re Guardianship of JadwisiakOhio Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Piaskoski & Associates v. RicciardiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  2. Matter of Estate of KatchatagAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API