Legal Opinion

XAE CORP. v. SMR Property Management Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 9, 1998No. 87466PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARGRAVE, Justice.

¶ 1 We granted certiorari to review the question whether the implied covenant to market under the oil and gas lease extends to an overriding royalty interest owner. The overriding royalty interest in this ease was an in-kind interest granted by separate conveyance rather than reserved in the assignment of oil and gas leases. Specifically, the question is whether the defendants/appellants (hereinafter “SMR”) improperly deducted from the overriding royalties paid to plaintiffs their proportionate share of the costs incurred in gathering, processing and compressing gas produced…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Continental Potash, Inc. v. Freeport-McMoran, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Garman v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Wood v. TXO Production Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Mittelstaedt v. Santa Fe Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. De Mik v. CargillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stirman v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Trust v. XTO Energy, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2010
  4. McCall v. Chesapeake Energy Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  5. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. HyderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API