Hurt v. Edgell
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Allen, J.:
This is an action by a laborer against a contractor and his bondsmen for wages and for the penalty provided for in G. S. 1935, 44-308. The amended petition was attacked by a motion to make more definite and certain and to separately state and number the causes of action. This motion was overruled in part and sustained in part. The defendant then lodged a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition. This appeal is from the order of the trial court overruling the demurrer.
The plaintiff, for his first cause of action, alleged:
“That he is a resident of and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- McCarthy v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Grisell v. Noel Bros. Flour, Feed Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Robinette v. Hubbard Coal Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
- Luske v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Keith v. KottasMontana Supreme Court · 1946
- Gawthrop v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Brewer v. Kansas Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Tanner v. Imperial Recreation Parlors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Riley v. Mayrath Machinery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963