In re Domestic Drywall Antitrust Litigation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RE PLAINTIFFS SUPPLYING FACTUAL INFORMATION SUPPORTING ALLEGATIONS
BAYLSON, District Judge.
The issue presented is whether Plaintiffs must provide facts supporting Plaintiffs’ allegations—a frequent issue in antitrust litigation. The Court concludes, because of *229Plaintiffs’ counsel’s felicitous access to electronically stored information, that Plaintiffs must provide a pretrial statement setting forth the facts they now have, and Defendants must subsequently reciprocate.
Ignoring the capabilities which ESI allows the parties to search for and produce factual information in a case of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Convergent Technologies Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Woods v. Deangelo Marine Exhaust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Moore v. Publicis GroupeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- B. Braun Medical Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re: Domestic Drywall Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Livingston et.al. v. VIWAPADistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2022
- STRAIGHT ARROW PRODUCTS, INC. v. THE MANE CHOICE HAIR SOLUTION LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021