Legal Opinion

In re Domestic Drywall Antitrust Litigation

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 2014No. MDL No. 2437; No. 13-MD-2437PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM RE PLAINTIFFS SUPPLYING FACTUAL INFORMATION SUPPORTING ALLEGATIONS

BAYLSON, District Judge.

The issue presented is whether Plaintiffs must provide facts supporting Plaintiffs’ allegations—a frequent issue in antitrust litigation. The Court concludes, because of *229Plaintiffs’ counsel’s felicitous access to electronically stored information, that Plaintiffs must provide a pretrial statement setting forth the facts they now have, and Defendants must subsequently reciprocate.

Ignoring the capabilities which ESI allows the parties to search for and produce factual information in a case of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Convergent Technologies Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
  2. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  3. Woods v. Deangelo Marine Exhaust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  4. Moore v. Publicis GroupeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. B. Braun Medical Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re: Domestic Drywall Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Livingston et.al. v. VIWAPADistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2022
  3. STRAIGHT ARROW PRODUCTS, INC. v. THE MANE CHOICE HAIR SOLUTION LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API