Legal Opinion
B. Braun Medical Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 13, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 93-3883PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUYETT District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
B. Braun Medical Inc. (“Plaintiff’) alleges that Defendant Abbott Laboratories (“Abbott”) commissioned, and Defendant Nypro Inc. (“Nypro”) manufactures, a “luer activated valve” (“LAV”) which infringes upon U.S. Patent No. 4,168,916 (“916 Patent”) issued to Plaintiffs employee. Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel responses to certain interrogatories (“Abbott Int.” or “Nypro Int.”), admission requests (“Abbott Ad. Req.” or “Nypro Ad. Req.”) and document requests (“Abbott *527Doe. Req.” or “Nypro Doc. Req.”). For the reasons stated below,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re Convergent Technologies Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
- Howard A. Fromson v. Western Litho Plate and Supply Co. And Bemis Company, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Scovill Manufacturing Co. v. Sunbeam Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- Fischer & Porter Co. v. TolsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
- Everett v. USAir Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. v. Hewlett Packard Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- In re Grand Casinos, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Federal Trade Commission v. Capital City Mortgage Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.