Legal Opinion

Anton J. Miller v. Helen Delaune

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1979No. 76-2660PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Per curiam

Anton Miller, an attorney proceeding pro se, appeals from the dismissal of his amended complaint for failure to state a claim. The amended complaint essentially alleged, albeit with much confusion, that as a result of blackmail, fraud and intimidations by the appellee, an official of the Internal Revenue Service, acting by herself or in concert with others, the appellant forwarded or delivered a certain sum of money to the Internal Revenue Service which was purportedly owing on his tax liability. It was also alleged that the payment was wrongly deposited in violation of an oral trust and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Norman Birnbaum, B. Leonard Avery and Mary Rule MacMillen Plaintiffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. Howard v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Allen v. ScribnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Mohammad Sami v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  3. Kenneth B. Krohn v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. Jehan Zeb Mir v. Richard G. Fosburg, Perry Ah-Tye, and Horrace WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Arnold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API