Legal Opinion

Pepper v. Naimish

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1972No. Docket 11755PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs own a parcel of land in Highland Township, Michigan, adjacent to land owned by defendants. Defendants’ land is contiguous to Duck Lake. Plaintiffs’ land is west of the defendants’. There is a small body of water on plaintiffs’ land which is the subject of this dispute. Defendants have made substantial improvements on their property over the years, including dredging a channel from Duck Lake which exists on their property. The channel is separated from the water on plaintiffs’ property by a “roadway”. As a result of defendants’ operations, this “roadway” has been filled in.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dauer v. ZabelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Kerley v. WolfeMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Rice v. NaimishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Tann v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Patrons' Mutual Fire Insurance v. GoodmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leidig v. Rockwood & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Maynard v. DornerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API