Pepper v. Naimish
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs own a parcel of land in Highland Township, Michigan, adjacent to land owned by defendants. Defendants’ land is contiguous to Duck Lake. Plaintiffs’ land is west of the defendants’. There is a small body of water on plaintiffs’ land which is the subject of this dispute. Defendants have made substantial improvements on their property over the years, including dredging a channel from Duck Lake which exists on their property. The channel is separated from the water on plaintiffs’ property by a “roadway”. As a result of defendants’ operations, this “roadway” has been filled in.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dauer v. ZabelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Kerley v. WolfeMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Rice v. NaimishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Tann v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Patrons' Mutual Fire Insurance v. GoodmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leidig v. Rockwood & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Maynard v. DornerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974