Legal Opinion

Maynard v. Dorner

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1974No. Docket 17300PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Supplemental Opinion

Holbrook, J.

This case was remanded to the trial court for further and more explicit findings of fact and conclusions of law. 53 Mich App 568, 575; 220 NW2d 161, 165 (1974). This the trial court has done.

The facts of the present case are set out in the previous opinion. In pertinent parts, the trial court has found:

" * * * That the evidence conclusively shows that the various businesses operated by the defendants were in fact operated by both of them as a husband and wife team.
" * * * That the court does not believe the testimony of the defendant, Bonnie Dorner, as she…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lobato v. PaulinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Thurston v. Detroit Asphalt & Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Tait v. RossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Moore v. DubardMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Morrison v. MeisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McElwee v. WhartonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1998
  2. Crowell v. Twin Oaks Golf Course (In Re Twin Oaks Golf Course)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API