Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1975No. L.A. 30328PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of California (Disciplinary Board) that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for two years, the first year being actual suspension and the second year probation.

Petitioner was admitted to practice in California in 1938. He has no prior record of discipline.

In the mid-1950s petitioner befriended Mr. and Mrs. Philip R. Tarr, and began doing various legal work for them. Mr. Tarr had a history of mental illness and had been committed intermittently to mental institutions, as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Lewis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Sullivan v. DunneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Toll v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Matter of LevineArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Matter of WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Ramirez v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Dixon v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API