Legal Opinion
White v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 28, 1932No. Docket Nos. 915, 916, 917, 918, 919PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOVEL, J., pro tem.
The above-entitled actions, all based on analogous facts, were consolidated for trial in the lower court. Judgment was entered in favor of defendants in all cases, from which judgments the several plaintiffs have appealed. The appeals have also been consolidated for hearing in this court.
From the transcript, it appears that in 1926 the City of San Diego was contemplating the construction of a dam on the San Dieguito River, in San Diego County, for the impounding of water to be diverted from the watershed to the city and used for domestic purposes. It was therefore…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Collier v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Tennant v. WildeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Merrill v. KohlbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Smith v. BergengrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Allen v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Corcoran v. San Francisco City & County Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Lundin v. Hallmark Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Townsend v. WinglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Byron Jackson Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.