Legal Opinion

United States v. Marshall Pecore

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 30, 2011No. 10-2676, 10-3599PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

After a six-year investigation, an additional two-and-one-half years of discovery and pretrial posturing, and a nine-day jury trial, Marshall Pecore and Conrad Waniger (the “defendants”) prevailed against civil charges that they violated the False Claims Act (“FCA”). Unsatisfied with just the trial victory and perhaps disturbed that the government spent nearly a decade chasing about $75,000, the defendants moved for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), or alternatively, sanctions under Rule 37(c)(2) of the Federal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Stewart v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Hicklin Engineering, L.C., Cross-Appellee v. R.J. Bartell and R.J. Bartell & Associates, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  5. Fednav International Ltd. v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  2. Flextronics International, USA, Inc. v. Sparkling Drink Systems Innovation Center Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Town of Smyrna v. Municipal Gas AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015
  4. Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. United States ex rel. Garbe v. Kmart Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API