Legal Opinion

Gracie, LLC v. Idaho State Tax Commission

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2010No. 36111PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

Gracie, LLC, and Barnes & Barnes Enterprises, LLC, appeal the district court’s decision requiring that they pay use tax on their out-of-state purchases of tanning and spa equipment. We affirm.

I

Background

Gracie, LLC, and Barnes & Barnes Enterprises, LLC, (the taxpayers) separately own and operate several Planet Beach tanning salons in Ada and Canyon Counties. Planet Beach generates revenue by offering a variety of tanning and spa services that are catered to the individual needs of its customers. Planet Beach customers may purchase a range of options, from a single tanning…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. P.O. Ventures, Inc. v. Loucks Family Irrevocable TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Intermountain Forest Management, Inc. v. LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORP.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Boise Tower Associates, LLC v. HoglandIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Futura Corporation v. State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Martin Hayes v. City of PlummerIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Nielson v. TalbotIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Chandler's-Boise LLC v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Guenther v. RyersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Cable One, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API