Legal Opinion
Boise Tower Associates, LLC v. Hogland
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided August 24, 2009No. 34333PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W. JONES, Justice.
NATURE OF CASE
This appeal arises out of a failed condominium tower project that Boise Tower Associates (BTA) intended to build in downtown Boise, Idaho. BTA filed a lawsuit against Timothy Hogland (Hogland) and the City of Boise, alleging constitutional violations and other causes of action stemming from the mistaken miscalculation of BTA’s building permit expiration date. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Hog-land and the City of Boise. BTA brought this appeal. We affirm in part and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ridgley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Potlatch Education Ass'n v. Potlatch School District No. 285Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- Brown v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- BORLEY v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.