Legal Opinion

Martin Hayes v. City of Plummer

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2015No. 42125PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

This case concerns an appeal from the Kootenai County Distinct Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent City of Plummer on Martin and Lynn Hayes’s premises liability claims. The district court ruled that Idaho’s Recreational Use Statute, Idaho Code section 36-1604, provided limited liability protection because the City did not receive “compensation” or “charge” for the use of the land upon which Hayes was injured. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On September 17, 2011, Martin Hayes (Hayes) 1 was seriously injured after stumbling on uneven ground…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SchulzIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Carolyn L. Ducey v. United States of America, Lois M. Olson v. United States of America, Helen Grugel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Castorena v. General ElectricIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Farber v. Idaho State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Corey v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. Michelle Faye McIntoshIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. SmalleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Zeyen v. Pocatello/Chubbuck School Dist 25Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  4. IDHW v. John Doe (2022-32)Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Smith v. Kount Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2021

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API