Martin Hayes v. City of Plummer
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Justice.
This case concerns an appeal from the Kootenai County Distinct Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent City of Plummer on Martin and Lynn Hayes’s premises liability claims. The district court ruled that Idaho’s Recreational Use Statute, Idaho Code section 36-1604, provided limited liability protection because the City did not receive “compensation” or “charge” for the use of the land upon which Hayes was injured. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On September 17, 2011, Martin Hayes (Hayes) 1 was seriously injured after stumbling on uneven ground…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. SchulzIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Carolyn L. Ducey v. United States of America, Lois M. Olson v. United States of America, Helen Grugel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Castorena v. General ElectricIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Farber v. Idaho State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Corey v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. Michelle Faye McIntoshIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. SmalleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
- Zeyen v. Pocatello/Chubbuck School Dist 25Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
- IDHW v. John Doe (2022-32)Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
- Smith v. Kount Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2021
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.