Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Hogan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1915No. Docket No. 66PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Ionia; Davis, J. Bill by Daniel Hogan and others against Patrick M. Hogan and another for the specific performance of an oral contract. From the decree entered, both parties appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, C. J.

The complainants in this cause are three of the children of the defendant, Patrick M. Hogan. The other defendant, Dennis J. Hogan, is a fourth child of Patrick M. Hogan. Besides the three complainants and the defendant Dennis, there were four others, as follows: Bridget, born in 1871, now, dead; Margaret, born in 1874, now a widow; James, born in 1875; and Mary, born in 1882. The three complainants were born, respectively,' Daniel in 1881, Katherine in 1885, and Patrick in 1886.

The family history is somewhat peculiar in that, of the eight children, only three were ever married— Bridget,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. CarmichaelMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Twiss v. GeorgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Lamb v. HinmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Bird v. PopeMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Taft v. TaftMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peoples Savings Bank v. GeistertMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Nickerson v. NickersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Mayes v. Central Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Friend v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Lugauer v. HustedMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API