United States v. Dist. Council of New York City
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge.
This matter is currently before the Court on motions by two separately represented groups of petitioners to intervene in this action.
The petitioners represented by the firm of Dublirer, Haydon, Straci & Victor, hereinafter referred to as the “Macagnone Petitioners,” seek leave to intervene as of right pursuant to Rule 24(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., or alternatively by permission under Rule 24(b), and also for class certification under Rule 23. The second group of petitioners, represented by the firm of Bisceglie & Friedman and hereinafter…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Berger v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Local No. 48, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Local 359, United Seafood WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper Fund, Inc. v. City of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004