Legal Opinion
Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper Fund, Inc. v. City of Atlanta
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided December 7, 2004No. Civil Action Nos. 1:95-CV-2550-TWT, 1:98-CV-1956-TWTPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
THRASH, District Judge.
These are consolidated actions against the City of Atlanta regarding the City’s waste water collection and treatment system. The actions are brought pursuant to section 309 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1319, and the Georgia Water Quality Control Act, O.C.G.A. § 12-5-20 et seq. They are before the Court on the Fulton County Taxpayers Association, Inc.’s Motion to Intervene [1:95— CV-2550-TWT Doc. 177] [1:98-CV-1956-TWT Doc. 70]. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Intervene is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
The Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions filed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., Edo Corporation Plessey, Inc. Vernitron Corp., Baii Banking Corp., Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Alisal Water Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Purcell v. BankAtlantic Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Georgia v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Inc. v. McCarthyDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2015
- Minor I Doe v. School Board for Santa Rosa CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2010