Legal Opinion

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 18, 1997No. 88 Civ. 4486(DNE)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

Background

This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by the United States of America against, inter alia, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT” or “the union”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board. The settlement is embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (“Consent Decree”). The goal of the Consent Decree is to rid the IBT of the hideous influence of organized crime. The long history of this case has been set forth in this Court’s numerous prior opinions. Accordingly, only those facts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers of America v. SadlowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Berger v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-Cio, Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Local 359, United Seafood WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local 580, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers, Joint Apprentice-Journeyman Educational FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & HelpersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. International Brotherhood Of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API