Moore v. Mark
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
The main question involved in this appeal is whether the contract entered into between the parties is usurious.
The appellees filed a complaint against the appellants in the Superior Court of Pima County for breach of contract. The case was tried before the court and appellants appeal from an adverse judgment awarding appellees the sum of $3,967.74.
The facts construed in the light most favorable to upholding the verdict are as follows. In 1965 appellant C. W- Moore was selling real estate in the state of Arizona. As a result of his activities he had the sum of $45,418.02…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Britz v. KinsvaterArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Blaisdell v. SteinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Seargeant v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Hallstrom v. BuhlerUtah Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Howell v. Mid-State Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Kasson v. BurgenerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018