Legal Opinion

Seargeant v. Smith

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1945No. Civil No. 4738PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAKE, Superior Judge.

The appellee Smith was a used car dealer and the appellant Seargeant was a licensed money lender under the Small Loan Statute of Arizona. Code 1939, § 51-801 et seq. Prom time to time appellee Smith would find a used car for sale. Appellant Seargeant, after inspection in each instance, would pay the purchase price of the car. The car was then put on appellee Smith’s used car lot. The appellant Seargeant held the certificate of title endorsed in blank. In each case appellant Seargeant gave appellee Smith an option on the car. The option entitled Smith to purchase the car…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SchnepfArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Blaisdell v. SteinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Hallenbeck v. Yuma CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Wood v. Phoenix-Tempe Stone Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Morrison v. ActonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Britz v. KinsvaterArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. De Wulf v. BissellArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Modern Pioneers Insurance Company v. NandinArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Transamerica Financial Corp. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API