Sher v. Leiderman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAUER, J.
Rudolph and Bonnie Sher appeal from a judgment against them in favor of P. Herbert and Gloria Leiderman following a court trial. Their appeal presents an issue of first impression in this state, namely, whether an owner of a residence designed to make use of solar energy can state a cause of action for private nuisance when trees on his neighbor’s property interfere with his solar access. We determine that California nuisance law does not provide a remedy for blockage of sunlight, and, for reasons discussed below, we decline to expand existing law.
The Shers’ appeal also…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- East Peninsula Education Council, Inc. v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Zipperer v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Wilson v. HandleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.