Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. County of Santa Clara

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1986No. H000984PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AGLIANO, P. J.

Greyhound Lines, Inc. appeals from the denial of its petition seeking relief from the time requirements for filing a governmental claim for equitable indemnity. We affirm.

The operative facts are few. Mary Ann Schroeder claims to have suffered injury due to a slip-and-fall in a Greyhound bus depot in Santa Barbara on October 22,1982. Sometime thereafter she received medical treatment from, among others, the Santa Clara Valley Medical Center. On October 6, 1983, she filed suit in San Francisco County Superior Court for personal injuries, with her husband joining a claim for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. McGlothlen v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Neveu v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005
  2. Munoz v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Fire Insurance Exchange v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. People v. KimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Gilberd v. AC TRANSITCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API