Legal Opinion

El Sawah v. Empire State Pipeline

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 30, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court’s determination of damages resulting from defendant’s taking of an easement on claimant’s property is supported by the evidence (see, Buisch v State of New York, 98 AD2d 967; Matter of Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v Lee, 83 AD2d 770). We reject claimant’s contention that the Trial Judge should have disqualified himself. There is no mandatory statutory basis for *929disqualification (see, Judiciary Law § 14), and nothing in the record supports the allegations of claimant that the court harbored bias and prejudice against him.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Buisch v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. El Sawah v. Empire State PipelineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API