Legal Opinion

Masheter v. Lanning

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1940No. 34,467PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action by a judgment debtor against the administrator of two estates of deceased cojudgment debtors to compel contribution after the joint and several judgment had been satisfied out of the property of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was one of four judgment debtors in a prior mortgage-foreclosure action. Plaintiff prevailed in the instant action for contribution, and the administrators of the decedents’ estates have appealed.

The judgment debtors had purchased the mortgaged real estate and assumed payment of the mortgage debt. A…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Fort Scott v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. Farmers State Bank v. CallahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Mentzer v. BurlingameSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Reed v. HumphreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Bristow v. First Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leidigh & Havens Lumber Co. v. WyattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Litwin v. BarrierCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  3. Gregory v. PorterfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API