Legal Opinion

McVicker v. McKenzie

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1902No. S.F. No. 2184PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

This suit was brought to recover money alleged to be due on four separate causes of action, set up in as many counts,—the first two on promissory notes; the third for money expended for the use of the defendant; the fourth for personal services, extending over a period of a little oyer two years and a half, and of the alleged value of two thousand dollars. On the first two counts of the complaint the court finds for the plaintiff, and that the aggregate amount due him was $1,444.50. On the third the finding is, that the plaintiff had expended for the use of the defendant the sum of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City Carpet Beating Etc. Works v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Treadwell v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Jackson v. ShawlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. McDonald v. LundWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Durant v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Pacific Wharf & Storage Co. v. Standard American Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hansen v. SandvikWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Duteau v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Ramm v. Hewitt-Lea Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API