Legal Opinion
City of Toledo v. Beazer Materials and Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 25, 1993No. 3:90 CV 7344PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DOWD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This action is before the Court on the motions to dismiss of defendants Beazer East, Inc. (“Beazer”) and The Interlake Corporation, The Interlake Companies, Inc. and Acme Steel Company (collectively referred to as “Interlake”), plaintiffs opposition thereto, and Beazer’s and Interlake’s replies. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
This case is brought by the City of Toledo (“the City”) for declaratory and injunctive relief and recovery of past and future costs and damages associated with alleged…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a California Corporation v. City of Lodi, California, Jack Sieglock, in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lodi Richard Prima, Jr., in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Randall A. Hays, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi City Attorney Michael C. Donovan, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Adam L. Babich, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Steven H. Doto, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Bret A. Stone, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney John R. Till, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Zevnik, Horton, Guibord and McGovern Llp, Individually and in Their Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorneys Fran E. Forkas, in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650, Unigard Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation Unigard Security Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation v. City of LodiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Raytheon Co. v. McGraw-Edison Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997
- People v. Thoro Products Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- United States v. Power Engineering Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Borough of Sayreville v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.