Legal Opinion
CITIZENS BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. MULYE
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 20, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00545Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CITIZENS BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-545 (RK) (RLS) Vv. (CONSOLIDATED) Defendants. KIRSCH, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Plaintiff Citizens Bank, N.A.’s (“Citizens”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 64, the “Motion”.) Defendant Nirmal Mulye! (“Mulye”) filed an opposition to the Motion (ECF No. 68, the “Opposition”), and Citizens filed a reply (ECF No. 70). The Court has considered the parties’ submissions and resolves the matter without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.