Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Greenbaum Sons Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1931No. Appeal, 321PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Appellee purchased bonds from appellant’s agent and brought this action to recover the loss sustained by reason of appellant’s refusal to perform its part of the agent’s oral agreement to repurchase the bonds. A recovery was had in the court below and this appeal followed.

The principal question for our determination is whether there is sufficient evidence from which the jury could find that the agent had express or implied authority to stipulate for the repurchase of the bonds at the time he sold them. The jury found from the evidence that such authority existed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tarentum Lumber Co. v. MarvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Armstrong v. OrlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Richards v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burns v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Rooster, Inc. v. Raphael Roy, S.R.L. (In Re Rooster, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Rader v. PalletzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Gribble v. MillerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Allegheny Ludlum Industries, Inc. v. CPM Engineers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API