Legal Opinion

Rawson v. Sears Roebuck and Co.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided June 6, 1984No. Civ. A. 81-K-1454PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER REGARDING POST-TRIAL MOTIONS

KANE, District Judge.

On January 30, 1984 a jury of seven found that Sears, Roebuck and Co. violated Colo.Rev.Stat. § 8-2-116 when it terminated Gary Rawson from his job as manager of its Pueblo store in March of 1979. Defendant moved for a directed verdict at the end of plaintiffs case and at the end of its own case. I denied both motions. Since the date of the jury verdict, the following briefs and motions have been filed for my consideration: Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of Sears’ liability under § 8-2-116; Plaintiff’s brief…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pipeliners Local Union No. 798, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and A. Leroy Jones v. Fred H. EllerdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  2. Thomas D. Joyce v. Atlantic Richfield Company, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  3. Frick v. AbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. Perrell v. Financeamerica Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. Rawson v. Sears Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Resolution Trust Corp. v. FialaDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1994
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. WiseDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1991
  3. Gary Rawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Brezinski v. F.W. Woolworth Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1986
  5. Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API