Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Hall

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 6, 1986No. 64059PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHTMIRE, Presiding Judge.

The controversy here is between two family factions each of whom claim title to a certain five-acre parcel of land. The ultimate issue to resolve is whether granting a summary judgment quieting title to the subject land in the counterclaiming defendants was an appropriate disposition of the lawsuit.

We hold it was not, reverse the judgment and remand for trial.

I

By way of introducing the dispute it may be said that plaintiffs, proceeding under *481the banner of Bessie Davis,1 claim title to the subject land by virtue of an executed oral contract for deed made in 1950…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Woods v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Hester v. WattsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Miller v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Ware v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zilkha Energy Company v. Arthur Leighton, Verna Leighton, George W. Leighton, Susan Kay Stansberry, Ann E. Thompson, and Michael Frank ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. Hitch Enterprises, Inc. v. Cimarex Energy Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API