Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dayton Women's Health Center v. Enix

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1990No. 89-221Published

1DissentAlice Robie Resnick, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that an order, “pursuant to Civ. R. 23(C) determining that an action shall or shall not be maintained as a class action, is a final appealable order * * *.” (Emphasis added.) A ruling that an action may be maintained as a class action is totally different from the denial of certification. Hence, I cannot initially accept that they both should be treated the same on the issue of appealability as final orders.

The majority bases its holding on Amato v. General Motors Corp. (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 253, 21 O.O. 3d 158, 423 N.E. 2d 452, wherein it…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. General Accident Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Piltzer v. Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Amato v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API