Legal Opinion
In Re the Arbitration Between Knickerbocker Agency, Inc. & Holz
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 1958PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*248Chief Judge Conway.
The question here to be determined is whether petitioners, residents of this State and alleged debtors of a domestic insurance company in liquidation, may insist on having their , dispute with the company determined by arbitration as provided for in a contract between the company and petitioners, or whether the Supreme Court is the exclusive forum for the resolution of the controversy.
Prior to April 30, 1951 the Preferred. Accident Insurance Company was a casualty insurance corporation organized under the Insurance Law of the State of New York. On January 26, 1950 Preferred…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- People v. Globe Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Bohlinger v. ZangerNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Motlow v. Southern Holding & Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & NombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Gerald Grimes v. Crown Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Maross Construction, Inc. v. Central New York Regional Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Law Enforcement Insurance Company, Ltd. v. James P. CorcoranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.