State v. Stockton
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Defendant was convicted under ORS 163.555 of criminal nonsupport of a child during a specific two-month period of nonpayment. He seeks a reduction in the amount of restitution from $5,180, representing 28 months of arrearages, ordered by the trial court, to $450, representing only two months. We remand for resentencing.
The state concedes that the trial court exceeded its statutory authority in ordering restitution for more than the two months for which defendant was convicted, because defendant’s criminal liability for the remaining 26 months of nonsupport arrearages was never established.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.