Legal Opinion

Stout v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 2001No. 00-314PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶ 1] Luke Ray Stout (Appellant) appeals the denial of his motions to withdraw his guilty plea filed prior to sentencing and his request for new counsel. Appellant also claims that his counsel did not adequately represent him at sentencing. We affirm.

[T2] Appellant raises two issues on appeal:

Issue I

Whether the district court abused its discretion in failing to fully explore Appellant's request for substitute counsel; in the alternative, the district court abused its discretion in not rejecting, on its own motion, Appellant's guilty plea, or failing to grant Appellant's motion…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Byerly v. MadsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Doles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Bear Cloud v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Strickland v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. McCard v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Brian J. Noel v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API