Legal Opinion
Tomich v. Missouri Bd. of Probation and Parole
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided April 5, 1984No. 80-0120-CV-W-5PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SCOTT 0. WRIGHT, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has provisionally filed in forma pauperis a complaint under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking equitable relief to compel the Missouri Board of - Probation and Parole to allow him to review his parole file to correct any erroneous information contained therein, to inform him of information that will be considered at his parole hearing, and to consider only his present conviction in determining whether he is entitled to parole. Pending before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The Court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Martha POE, Appellant, v. JOHN DEERE COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Robert J. Scarpa v. U. S. Board of Parole, Walter Dunbar, ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Watley v. Missouri Board of Probation & ParoleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992