Legal Opinion

Bailey v. . Inman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBOENE, J.

Plaintiff’s challenge to the correctness of the judgment of the Superior Court fails for these reasons:(1) The contract of sale and purchase alleged to be usurious clearly states that the balance of $700.00 of the purchase price is payable in installments of $12.00 every 28 days until the full sum of $700.00 be paid — interest to run “at the rate of 6% per annum.” While there is a breakdown and spread of the twelve dollar payments into principal and interest, there is nothing in the contract to show that it was the intention to take or to charge a greater rate of interest than the legal rate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Doster v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. Waters v. GarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Miller v. . DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Charles A. Riley Co. v. W. T. Sears & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Waters v. . GarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Associated Stores, Inc. v. Industrial Loan & Investment Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1962
  2. NCNB Financial Services, Inc. v. Stevcoknit, Inc. (In Re Stevcoknit, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  3. Perry v. DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API