Bailey v. . Inman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBOENE, J.
Plaintiff’s challenge to the correctness of the judgment of the Superior Court fails for these reasons:(1) The contract of sale and purchase alleged to be usurious clearly states that the balance of $700.00 of the purchase price is payable in installments of $12.00 every 28 days until the full sum of $700.00 be paid — interest to run “at the rate of 6% per annum.” While there is a breakdown and spread of the twelve dollar payments into principal and interest, there is nothing in the contract to show that it was the intention to take or to charge a greater rate of interest than the legal rate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Doster v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Waters v. GarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Miller v. . DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Charles A. Riley Co. v. W. T. Sears & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Waters v. . GarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Associated Stores, Inc. v. Industrial Loan & Investment Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1962
- NCNB Financial Services, Inc. v. Stevcoknit, Inc. (In Re Stevcoknit, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Perry v. DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959