Legal Opinion

Brown Hauling Co. v. Newsome

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 29, 1941No. 6 Div. 742PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff’s car collided with defendant’s tiuck at the intersection of 24th Street and 36th Avenue in the City of Birmingham, inflicting injuries for which plaintiff recovered a judgment upon a complaint containing two counts, the first resting upon simple negligence and the second, wantonness. The refusal of the affirmative charge as to each count is assigned as error and argued in brief.

Likewise the denial of the motion for a new trial is assigned as error. These are the only questions here presented for decision.

The proof was ample to the effect that the driver of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Duke v. GainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Birmingham Electric Co. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. Law v. SaksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Greer v. MarriottAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. BrowningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Williams v. Roche Undertaking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Johnson v. SextonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. BROWNELL-O'HEAR PONTIAC COMPANY v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Frey v. Central Mutual InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API