Legal Opinion

Duke v. Gaines

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 10, 1932No. 6 Div. 5PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

Action under the homicide statute (Code 1923, § 5696) for negligent or wanton conduct causing the death of plaintiff’s intestate.

Decedent, A. A. Gaines, came to his death, according to plaintiff’s evidence, as the result of personal injury received by coming in collision with an automobile owned and driven by the defendant at a public street crossing.

The first insistence is that defendant was due the affirmative charge on the wanton count.

“Wanton injury” was quite accurately defined by the trial court in these words: “Wantonness is a conscious doing of some act or omission of some duty under…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Citizen's L. H. & P. Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Shafer v. MyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Griffin Lumber Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Baptist Medical Center v. ByarsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Hamilton v. BrowningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Graves v. WildsmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API