Legal Opinion
Law v. Saks
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 27, 1941No. 6 Div. 815PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER,,Chief Justice.
Plaintiff, Rosabel Saks, while driving a Buiclc coupe, collided with a Cord car driven by defendant, Madeline Law, the collision occurring on Clairmont Avenue in Birmingham, Alabama, and recovered a judgment against the latter for damages caused by the collision from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted.
The Saks car was travelling west, the Law c-ar going east, the width of Clairmont Avenue being 30 feet. The weather was dry, the time Sunday about 2 P.M. with no evidence offered as to the frequency of travel on this avenue at that' or any‘other time of day.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Godfrey v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- McNeil v. Munson S. S. LinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Sington v. Birmingham Ry., Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- First Nat. Bank of Dothan v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Daniel v. MotesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Turrietta v. WycheNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Thompson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Riley-Stabler Construction Company, a Division of Riley Lumber & Supply Company, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Christ v. SpizmanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.