Legal Opinion

United States v. Hall

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 7, 2018No. Criminal No. 2004-0543Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 04-543 (BAH) CHARLES E. HALL, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Upon consideration of the defendant’s pro se Motion for Extension of Time to File a Memorandum of Law in Support of a Habeas Corpus § 2255 Motion, ECF No. 227, pro se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence, ECF No. 227-1, pro se Affirmation in Support of Memorandum of Law and Habeas Corpus § 2255 Motion, ECF No. 228, counseled Motion for a New Trial Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(“Def.’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. David Isaiah Garris v. Charles S. Lindsay, Administrator, Maximum Security FacilityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Jonathan Jay PollardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API