Fiolek v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
*487 Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the decision of the defendant commissioner of motor vehicles suspending his license to operate a motor vehicle pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227b.1 The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) found that there was sufficient evidence in the administrative record to support the commissioner’s decision, (2) found that the commissioner’s decision complied with a prior remand, (3) sustained the commissioner’s decision and (4) failed to follow the law of the case doctrine. We affirm the…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Karrlo K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Krondes v. O'BoyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Fiolek v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Superior Court · 1997
4Cited by3 opinions
- Funderburk v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Braver v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Fiolek v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999