Legal Opinion
Funderburk v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 19, 2002No. AC 21481PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The plaintiff, Karl W. Funderburk, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the decision of the defendant commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner) suspending *656his motor vehicle operator’s license for six months for failing a breath test pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227b.1 On appeal, he claims that (1) there was insufficient evidence to show that he failed a chemical alcohol test and (2) the hearing officer improperly allowed into evidence the A-44 arrest form and attachments.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schallenkamp v. DelPonteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Bancroft v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Roy v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Fiolek v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Fiolek v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Superior Court · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- United Technologies Corp./Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Division v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- American Fed. Mun. Employees v. State, No. Cv 01 0511015s (Jun. 25, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Animal Rights Front v. Glastonbury Pzc, No. Cv 01-0806758 (Nov. 15, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002