Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Martin v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1993No. 92-475PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the court of appeals’ decision to exempt documents from public release based upon promises of confidentiality or threats to the physical safety of witnesses. See R.C. 149.43(A)(2)(b) and (d). We also affirm that court’s finding that certain witness statements were exempt from release as “trial preparation records” under R.C. 149.43(A)(4).

At the outset, we reject Martin’s effort to require that a public document, within its four corners, specify the promise of confidentiality to witnesses or the threat to their physical safety in order to be exempt from release under R.C.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State ex rel. Polovischak v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Zuern v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Thompson Newspapers, Inc. v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State ex rel. Vindicator Printing Co. v. WatkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Widmar v. Mohney, 2007-G-2776 (3-7-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Narciso v. Powell Police Dept.Ohio Court of Claims · 2018
  3. Radovanic v. CosslerOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Russin v. Shepherd, 2006-G-2708 (6-22-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. GreshamOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API