Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. Town of Eaton

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1906No. 5,647PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From Delaware Circuit Court; Joseph Q. Lejfler, Judge. Supplemental proceedings by tbe Town of Eaton against Absalom B. Hobbs and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant Hobbs appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

This is a proceeding supplementary to execution, begun by appellee against appellant and tbe Muncie, Hartford & Ft. Wayne Eailway Company, by a duly verified complaint in one paragraph. Demurrer to tbe complaint for want of facts overruled. Denial filed, trial, and *630judgment for appellee. Motion for a new trial overruled. (1) The first error assigned questions the sufficiency of the complaint.

The complaint in substance states that appellee recovered a judgment, before a justice of the peace, against appellant for less than $50; that execution wás issued and returned, “no property found;” that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parkison v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Hudelson v. HudelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Carmel Natural Gas & Improvement Co. v. SmallIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Campbell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Burkett v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hammond v. 8th Jud. Dist. Ct., N.M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Mitchell v. Godsey, AdministratrixIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In Re ValeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
  4. North v. NewlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Hedges v. MehringIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API