Legal Opinion

In Re Vale

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided January 23, 1989No. 19-30027PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1

KENT LINDQUIST, Chief Judge.

I

Statement of Proceedings

Dean and Susan Vale (hereinafter: “Debtors”) filed their motion on December 17, 1987 to avoid the nonpossessory, non-purchase money lien of Beneficial Finance Co., of Indiana (hereinafter: “Beneficial”) pursuant to § 522(f)(2)(A). A timely objection was filed by Beneficial on December 23, 1987.

Pursuant to prehearing order of January 20, 1988, the parties stipulated that Appendix “A” to that order is a true and accurate list of the tangible personal property in question, and that the only items in issue, as set…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. In the Matter of Richard E. BARKER, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Farmers Bank v. McCloud (In Re McCloud)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1980
  5. Sweeney v. Pacific Finance Co. (In Re Sweeney)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1980

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Victor D. McGreevy Darlene A. McGreevy Debtors. Darlene A. McGreevy v. Itt Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. Reid v. ITT Financial Services (In Re Reid)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1990
  3. United States v. Julius C. BomarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. In Re IrwinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  5. In Re FrenchUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API