Legal Opinion

Shanghnessy v. Fogg

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1860PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Fourth District Court of New Orleans, Price, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Merrick, O. J.

The plaintiff having issued an execution against his judgment debtor, propounded twenty-one interrogatories, under the Act of 1839, to the garnishee, A. T. Steele, Esq., an attorney and counsellor at law, in order to ascertain whether he has funds in his hands belonging to the defendant.

A. T. Steele answered the first three, and declined to answer the remaining interrogatories except partially, on the ground that he was called upon to disclose privileged communications received from his clients, and that the facts sought can only be proved in a revocatory action, and not in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chirac v. ReinickerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Walsh v. Washington Marine InsuranceThe Superior Court of New York City · 1865
  3. McCrummen v. StewartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  4. Travis v. JanuarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Vogelstein v. Warden of the County JailNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  2. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. v. All TaxpayersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. In Re IllidgeOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Elliott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1904
  5. In re DonohueDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API