Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 13, 1991No. 13471-3-IIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

On July 22,1989, the defendant burglarized a branch of Seattle-First National Bank. Before that date, the bank had had a surveillance system installed. It consisted of three cameras, each of which focused on a different part of the bank. When the defendant entered the bank, he automatically triggered these cameras, and one of them filmed him as he performed the crime.

On October 23, 1989, the court sentenced the defendant, and on December 20, 1989, it entered an order requiring that he pay $1,806.72 in restitution to the bank. The $1,806.72 represented $720 for labor to remove the film from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. SommervilleWashington Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API