Legal Opinion

Chicago Electric Light Renting Co. v. Hutchinson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 28, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. John P. Altgeld, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This was a suit in assumpsit, brought by William S. Hutchinson against the Chicago Electric Light Benting Company and John H. Hapgood, to recover upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:

“ §125.00. Chicago, Sept. 8th, 1885.
“ Thirty days after date, we promise to pay to the order of W. S. Hutchinson one hundred and twenty-five dollars, at 57 Honoré Block. Value received.

i( Chicago Electric Light Behtihg Co.,

“ Johh H. Hapgood, Manager.”

Both of the defendants having been duly served with process, judgment was rendered against them by default for $126.20 and costs. A stipulation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCullough v. MossCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
  2. New York Iron Mine v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Benedict v. LansingNew York Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jackson Paper Manufacturing Co. v. Commercial National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Elkhart Hydraulic Co. v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. St. Vincent College v. HallettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
  4. Sanford Cattle Co. v. WilliamsColorado Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Bippus v. VailAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API