Bippus v. Vail
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomson
The plaintiff, Bippus, brought this suit against the defendant, Vail, on a promissory note for $5,000, signed by the defendant Vail and four others, and drawn to the order of George D. Jones, and indorsed “Geo. D. Jones.” The plaintiff’s declaration consisted of the consolidated common counts and a special count, reciting the execution and the indorsement of the note. The defendant filed five pleas: (1) nonassumpsit; (2) that the note was not executed by him; (3) that the plaintiff was not a holder in due course, because the note was without consideration and was not indorsed by the payee;…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Curtiss v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
- Bailey v. Valley National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Morris v. PrestonIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
- Palmer v. Nassau BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Sublette Exchange Bank v. FitzgeraldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Woodlawn Trust & Savings Bank v. DonahoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
- Felton v. Estate of HerrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Gallagher v. SchmidtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923