Nicholson v. Sorensen
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOOCHEVER, Justice.
Emil Peter Sorensen (hereinafter, the grandfather) died leaving a will which made no provision for four grandchildren who were alive at the time of the execution of the will. The guardian of the grandchildren filed a petition for a determination of heirship, claiming that the grandchildren were entitled to the shares of the estate which they would have received if their grandfather had died intes tate. The superior court approved the findings and recommendations of a master and denied the petition, from which judgment this appeal has been taken.
The grandfather’s son,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Di Filippo v. PrestonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
- Wells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Gerrish v. GerrishOregon Supreme Court · 1880
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Adamson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. RastopsoffCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- City of Kenai v. Friends of the Recreation Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Menard v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Arco Pipeline Co. v. 3.60 Acres, More or LessAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.